Consensus
- Stage 1—Discovery
- Ask a question,
- get a synthesized answer from the literature
Consensus is an AI academic search engine that searches over 200 million papers to answer research questions with cited papers, while the multilo is an intelligent writing environment where, along with research, you also write, cite, edit, and verify at the same place.
Trusted by researchers, clinicians and publishers worldwide










The real difference
As both tools are designed for AI research writing, their scope is completely different. Multilo starts where consensus stop assisting. Consensus helps you find the relevant sources with text, while Multilo turns that into a well-written cited draft.
Multilo—The IWE built to draft, cite, ask, and verify in your real document
Consensus—A web-based AI search engine for peer-reviewed literature
Once you understand where each tool fits in your research workflow, you’ll know instantly which one to choose. If you are still unsure, try both and see which matches your research needs.
| What you want to know | Multilo | Consensus |
|---|---|---|
Core function | Drafting a workspace that helps you find, cite, and synthesize literature while writing your complete manuscript. | Search engine—finds and synthesizes existing literature |
Drafts complete sections from a topic | Yes—a full, cited draft in one pass | No—Consensus has no document-drafting surface |
Where you actually write | Directly in your real .docx file | Nowhere—there's no editor; you'd write elsewhere and bring findings in yourself. |
Searches published literature | Yes—library and open literature across millions of papers, in support of drafting. | Yes—it's its core strength, across 220M+ peer-reviewed papers. |
Verifies claims in your own draft | Yes—dedicated claim check pass over your manuscript | No—ground its own summaries, not your writing |
Citation styles generated in-line | Yes—APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, IEEE, AMA, and more, placed as you write | No—references are exported, not inserted into a draft |
Citation traceable to exact source passage | Yes—opens side-by-side, highlighted | Cites source quotes in-app, but nothing to trace back to once you're writing elsewhere |
Video/animated overviews of a source | Yes — turns dense PDFs into short summaries to help you triage reading | No |
Citation export to reference managers | Native citation generation in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, IEEE, AMA, and more, placed directly in your draft | Exports to Zotero, EndNote, Mendeley, and Paperpile; generates bibliographies in your chosen style |
Works offline | Yes—a fully local-first desktop app | No—web-based only, no official offline or desktop mode |
Multilo
Drafting a workspace that helps you find, cite, and synthesize literature while writing your complete manuscript.
Consensus
Search engine—finds and synthesizes existing literature
Multilo
Yes—a full, cited draft in one pass
Consensus
No—Consensus has no document-drafting surface
Multilo
Directly in your real .docx file
Consensus
Nowhere—there's no editor; you'd write elsewhere and bring findings in yourself.
Multilo
Yes—library and open literature across millions of papers, in support of drafting.
Consensus
Yes—it's its core strength, across 220M+ peer-reviewed papers.
Multilo
Yes—dedicated claim check pass over your manuscript
Consensus
No—ground its own summaries, not your writing
Multilo
Yes—APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, IEEE, AMA, and more, placed as you write
Consensus
No—references are exported, not inserted into a draft
Multilo
Yes—opens side-by-side, highlighted
Consensus
Cites source quotes in-app, but nothing to trace back to once you're writing elsewhere
Multilo
Yes — turns dense PDFs into short summaries to help you triage reading
Consensus
No
Multilo
Native citation generation in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, IEEE, AMA, and more, placed directly in your draft
Consensus
Exports to Zotero, EndNote, Mendeley, and Paperpile; generates bibliographies in your chosen style
Multilo
Yes—a fully local-first desktop app
Consensus
No—web-based only, no official offline or desktop mode
What sets Multilo apart
Built around how researchers actually write — draft, cite, and refine without leaving your project.
Every research writing agent that you need for drafting, citation, and research lives inside your project. No need to open a separate window every time and copy-paste data.
Every source is formatted and placed in position as you write. No need to add every citation manually. Also, all the citations are clickable so you can verify them in real time.
It is a local-first desktop app that runs on your own device and keeps your unpublished research inside your computer, not in anyone's server. Nothing is uploaded unless you choose to.
Multilo drafts and refines with you, keeping the tone and argument consistent throughout the project. It doesn't work as a general AI but as real-time research assistance with everything verifiable.
You can paraphrase, summarize, or expand any passage without breaking a single citation with just one click. All types of editing tools are integrated inside your writing window.
Multilo finds and summarizes sources without leaving your project window. So you can read, write, and cite together at one place without breaking your working flow.
APA, MLA, Chicago, IEEE, and many more, for every style, both the in-text citation and reference list build together, and you can switch between them with one click.
Whether you are working on a research paper, a lengthy thesis, or a dissertation, Multilo organizes every chapter accordingly, keeping the references in place.
Draft, cite, research, and refine without ever leaving your project — and it all keeps working offline, on your device. Free to start, no account needed.
No, Consensus is built to find and synthesize the published literature on your specific topic. It has no document-editing surface where you can actually write and edit your work, while Multilo is the one that provides you with a complete writing environment where you open your Word document, edit your previous findings, and get help from Multilo AI in structuring and finding sources.
You can export papers you find from Consensus to Zotero, EndNote, Mendeley, or Paperpile and generate a bibliography in your chosen style, but you still have to add the list in your document yourself. On the other hand, Multilo finds you source, generates citations, and puts both in-line and long references in your article automatically after you approve that you accept that specific citation suggestion.
No, Consensus has no visibility to your manuscript; it is bound to verify the AI-generated summaries that it developed from the papers. It takes you to the exact source from where that text is taken. Multilo’s claim check works differently. It rereads your whole document and flags any sentence that overstates or misreads the cited source and gives you alternate, accurate suggestions, highlighting the exact passage from the sourced article.
Multilo is a web-based application; it needs a live internet connection to function. Multilo is a local-first desktop app, and a few AI functions work on internal data, but overall it is used offline so your unpublished research stays private throughout the writing process.
Definitely, you can do that. Find the sources from Consensus and give them the actual draft shape in multilo that will be more efficient. Consensus's core strength of literature finding is not something Multilo cannot do; it uses the same IP as Consensus does and searches millions of papers and gives relevant suggestions. What you are going to do in Consensus alone, you can do all of them together in Multilo for better consistency.