When Multilo's inline AI suggests text that makes a factual claim, it now backs the claim with as many library sources as the evidence supports — not just the single strongest match. Each citation is visible right inside the suggestion preview, and you can hover or click any one to see the source passage before you decide whether to accept the edit.
What it ships
- Multi-source citations per suggestion — when two, three, or four library passages all back the same claim, the suggestion threads them all in. The bibliography agent collapses them to the right citation style on save.
- Inline preview, no detour — every cited source is readable in place from the suggestion popover. No flipping back to the library, no second window. Read the actual quoted passage, decide, accept.
- Source attribution is per-claim, not per-paragraph — if one paragraph makes two distinct claims, each claim gets its own citation set. You're never wondering which sentence a reference is supposed to support.
- Citation style respected — APA, IEEE, Harvard, MLA, and Chicago are all aware of multi-source citations. The formatter does the right thing whether your style wants
(Smith, 2024; Jones, 2023),[12, 13], or numbered footnotes. - Library-first, web only when needed — Multilo prefers sources already in your project library because you've already vetted them. Web sources only get suggested when nothing in your library covers the claim.
How it works
- Trigger a suggestion — write a line, pause, and the inline AI proposes the next sentence as usual.
- See every backing source — the suggestion preview now shows every citation it intends to insert, with little chips you can hover for the source passage.
- Accept, edit, or reject per source — drop a citation that doesn't fit, swap one for a better library match via Claim Check, or accept the full suggestion as-is.
- Saved as proper inline citations — once accepted, the citations land in your
.docx/.mdformatted to your chosen style.
Why it matters
Reviewers care about citation density and provenance, not single best-source convenience. A claim with three independent corroborating sources is stronger than the same claim with one. Letting the suggestion engine surface every source it considered — and letting you vet each one before the edit lands — turns inline AI from a fast-but-shallow autocomplete into a reviewable evidence trail.
Try it
Open any project with a populated library, start writing in a .docx or .md document, and watch a suggestion. If the claim is supported by multiple library passages, the preview will show every one.